Robert Hensing 67cc78643d lib.sortOn: init ...

A more efficient sort in some cases, and often convenient.

This exposes `lib.lists.sortOn` immediately on `lib`, because it is
a sibling of `sort`, which is already present there.
Omitting it would lead to more confusion, and worse outcomes.
There's no confusion about the types `sort` or `sortOn` operate on.

Haskell agrees about the type for `sortOn`, and it is in its `base`.

2023-12-08 22:15:29 +01:00

7.5 KiB

Raw Blame History

View Raw