Changelog: https://github.com/anthropics/claude-code/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md
- Released output styles, including new built-in educational output styles "Explanatory" and "Learning"
- Plugin system improvements for repository installation messaging and error handling
- Agents: Fixed an issue with custom agent loading when agent files are unparsable
We also need to symlink libexec when doing fastCross.
It contains rust-analyzer-proc-macro-srv which rust-analyzer needs for proc macro expansion to work.
Splits the "occasionally" case into two, depending on whether the commit
has a diff or was not cherry-picked at all. Prepares the next commit,
where these are conditionally shown only.
This change allows giving a reason via footer of the commit message for
why this commit is not cherry-picked. This avoids having to "explain"
the automated review comment afterwards - instead, this explanation can
be given immediately when writing that commit.
For example, for an update of `xen` on the stable branch, this could be:
```
xen: 4.19.3-unstable-2025-07-09 -> 4.19.3
[... commit message ...]
Not-cherry-picked-because: unstable is on a different minor version
```
This would then be shown as part of the automated review. The severity
of this will be downgraded from "warning" to "important". We still treat
the review as "changes requested", because it would be very complicated
and noisy to handle two different categories of reviews, some with
requested changes and some with comments only.
An alternative would be to not show this review at all. However, given
that the reviewers expectation on backports should already be "if it's
not a clean backport, the automated review will tell me what to look
at", it seems better to show these and have the committer confirm by
dismissing the review. Otherwise we risk merging actually unreviewed
commits.
