The server component of trilium allows for OAuth to be configured.
Ideally secrets shouldn't be loaded in the nix store so this would allow
for an environment file to be passed in via sops/agenix/ect
Prior to this commit the build of `pkgsStatic.botan3.bin` produced a
dynamically linked binary, indenpendently of the move to
`pkgs/by-name`. Previous commit message and comments also suggest this
it was expected for the static build to only produce the static library,
not the statically linked cli.
Apparently with the move to by-name broke stdenv selection in such a way
that the resulting library archive from `pkgsStatic.botan3` no longer
was suitable for static linking, resulting in linking errors:
```
/nix/store/<...>-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-binutils-2.44/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-ld: cannot find -lbz2: No such file
/nix/store/<...>-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-binutils-2.44/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-ld: have you installed the static ve
/nix/store/<...>-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-binutils-2.44/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-ld: cannot find -ljitterentropy: No
/nix/store/<...>-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-binutils-2.44/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-ld: have you installed the static ve
/nix/store/<...>-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-binutils-2.44/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-ld: cannot find -lz: No such file or
/nix/store/<...>-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-binutils-2.44/bin/x86_64-unknown-linux-musl-ld: have you installed the static ve
```
Co-authored-by: Maximilian Bosch <maximilian@mbosch.me>
The last user to touch the schedule will be notified about errors in the
scheduled run. I used to be that, but somehow when renaming the workflow
this didn't happen anymore, so I didn't noticed the workflow failing for
quite some time.
I didn't like r-ryantm "authoring"; so I changed that to "created"
earlier. Arguably, using "opened" is more consistent with what is
actually checked and can consistently be used for both.
The by-name check would previously be green when the
`pkgs/by-name/README.md` file was changed. This would still not mean the
maintainer was able to merge the PR, because there'd be no maintainer
for that file, but the feedback was not 100% accurate.
TheWanderingCrow