gador/nixpkgs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

rocmPackages.rocblas: add comments about why some GPU archs are not built

Browse Source 
Signed-off-by: Gavin Zhao <git@gzgz.dev>
This commit is contained in:
Gavin Zhao
2024-04-25 11:45:45 -04:00
parent 32b9f37d57
commit c3848d59c9
1 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

8
pkgs/development/rocm-modules/6/rocblas/default.nix
View File

@@ -29,6 +29,14 @@
, tensileSepArch ? false
, tensileLazyLib ? false
, tensileLibFormat ? "msgpack"
# `gfx940`, `gfx941` are not present in this list because they are early
# engineering samples, and all final MI300 hardware are `gfx942`:
# https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/298388#issuecomment-2032791130
#
# `gfx1012` is not present in this list because the ISA compatibility patches
# would force all `gfx101*` GPUs to run as `gfx1010`, so `gfx101*` GPUs will
# always try to use `gfx1010` code objects, hence building for `gfx1012` is
# useless: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/298388#issuecomment-2076327152
, gpuTargets ? [ "gfx900;gfx906:xnack-;gfx908:xnack-;gfx90a:xnack+;gfx90a:xnack-;gfx942;gfx1010;gfx1030;gfx1100;gfx1101;gfx1102" ]
}: