nixpkgs/nixos

NixOS

NixOS is a Linux distribution based on the purely functional package management system Nix. More information can be found at https://nixos.org/nixos and in the manual in doc/manual.

Testing changes

You can add new module to your NixOS configuration file (usually it’s /etc/nixos/configuration.nix). And do sudo nixos-rebuild test -I nixpkgs=<path to your local nixpkgs folder> --fast.

Commit conventions

• Make sure you read about the commit conventions common to Nixpkgs as a whole.

• Format the commit messages in the following way:

  nixos/(module): (init module | add setting | refactor | etc)
  
  (Motivation for change. Link to release notes. Additional information.)
  

  Examples:

  • nixos/hydra: add bazBaz option

    Dual baz behavior is needed to do foo.

  • nixos/nginx: refactor config generation

    The old config generation system used impure shell scripts and could break in specific circumstances (see #1234).

Reviewing contributions

When changing the bootloader installation process, extra care must be taken. Grub installations cannot be rolled back, hence changes may break people’s installations forever. For any non-trivial change to the bootloader please file a PR asking for review, especially from @edolstra.

Module updates

Module updates are submissions changing modules in some ways. These often contains changes to the options or introduce new options.

Reviewing process:

• Ensure that the module maintainers are notified.
  • The continuous integration system will make GitHub notify users based on the submitted changes, but it can happen that it misses some of the package maintainers.
• Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
  • You may invoke OfBorg with @ofborg test <module> to build nixosTests.<module>
• Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
  • Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities, loaOf and string types are deprecated).
  • Description, default and example should be provided.
• Ensure that option changes are backward compatible.
  • mkRenamedOptionModuleWith provides a way to make renamed option backward compatible.
  • Use lib.versionAtLeast config.system.stateVersion "24.05" on backward incompatible changes which may corrupt, change or update the state stored on existing setups.
• Ensure that removed options are declared with mkRemovedOptionModule.
• Ensure that changes that are not backward compatible are mentioned in release notes.
• Ensure that documentations affected by the change is updated.

Sample template for a module update review is provided below.

##### Reviewed points

- [ ] changes are backward compatible
- [ ] removed options are declared with `mkRemovedOptionModule`
- [ ] changes that are not backward compatible are documented in release notes
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options types are appropriate
- [ ] options description is set
- [ ] options example is provided
- [ ] documentation affected by the changes is updated

##### Possible improvements

##### Comments

New modules

New modules submissions introduce a new module to NixOS.

Reviewing process:

• Ensure that all file paths fit the guidelines.
• Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
• Ensure that new module tests are added to the package passthru.tests.
• Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
  • Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities, loaOf and string types are deprecated).
  • Description, default and example should be provided.
    • Defaults may only be omitted if both:
      1. The user is required to set the default in order to properly use the service.
      2. The lack of a default does not break evaluation when the module is not enabled.
• Ensure that module meta field is present
  • Maintainers should be declared in meta.maintainers.
  • Module documentation should be declared with meta.doc.
• Ensure that the module respect other modules functionality.
  • For example, enabling a module should not open firewall ports by default.

Sample template for a new module review is provided below.

##### Reviewed points

- [ ] module path fits the guidelines
- [ ] module tests, if any, succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] module tests, if any, are added to package `passthru.tests`
- [ ] options have appropriate types
- [ ] options have default
- [ ] options have example
- [ ] options have descriptions
- [ ] No unneeded package is added to `environment.systemPackages`
- [ ] `meta.maintainers` is set
- [ ] module documentation is declared in `meta.doc`

##### Possible improvements

##### Comments