gador/nixpkgs
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ci/github-script/prepare: identify real base branch (#435596)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Wolfgang Walther
2025-08-25 12:05:12 +00:00
committed by GitHub
parent aa0f1764fe 87d9b08ffb
commit 40d8532c08
12 changed files with 296 additions and 256 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
.github/workflows/check.yml vendored
View File

@@ -31,24 +31,7 @@ defaults:
shell: bash
jobs:
no-channel-base:
name: no channel base
if: contains(fromJSON(inputs.baseBranch).type, 'channel')
runs-on: ubuntu-24.04-arm
steps:
- run: |
cat <<EOF
The nixos-* and nixpkgs-* branches are pushed to by the channel
release script and should not be merged into directly.
Please target the equivalent release-* branch or master instead.
EOF
exit 1
cherry-pick:
if: |
github.event_name == 'pull_request' ||
(fromJSON(inputs.baseBranch).stable && !contains(fromJSON(inputs.headBranch).type, 'development'))
commits:
permissions:
pull-requests: write
runs-on: ubuntu-24.04-arm
@@ -68,16 +51,20 @@ jobs:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ github.token }}
run: gh api /rate_limit | jq
- name: Check cherry-picks
- name: Check commits
id: check
uses: actions/github-script@60a0d83039c74a4aee543508d2ffcb1c3799cdea # v7.0.1
env:
TARGETS_STABLE: ${{ fromJSON(inputs.baseBranch).stable && !contains(fromJSON(inputs.headBranch).type, 'development') }}
with:
script: |
const targetsStable = JSON.parse(process.env.TARGETS_STABLE)
require('./trusted/ci/github-script/commits.js')({
github,
context,
core,
dry: context.eventName == 'pull_request',
cherryPicks: context.eventName == 'pull_request' || targetsStable,
})
- name: Log current API rate limits

4
.github/workflows/pr.yml vendored
View File

@@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ permissions: {}
jobs:
prepare:
runs-on: ubuntu-24.04-arm
permissions:
# wrong branch review comment
pull-requests: write
outputs:
baseBranch: ${{ steps.prepare.outputs.base }}
headBranch: ${{ steps.prepare.outputs.head }}
@@ -44,6 +47,7 @@ jobs:
github,
context,
core,
dry: context.eventName == 'pull_request',
})
check:

1
.github/workflows/push.yml vendored
View File

@@ -2,7 +2,6 @@ name: Push
on:
push:
# Keep this synced with ci/request-reviews/dev-branches.txt
branches:
- master
- staging

87
ci/github-script/commits.js
View File

@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
module.exports = async ({ github, context, core, dry }) => {
module.exports = async ({ github, context, core, dry, cherryPicks }) => {
const { execFileSync } = require('node:child_process')
const { classify } = require('../supportedBranches.js')
const withRateLimit = require('./withRateLimit.js')
const { dismissReviews, postReview } = require('./reviews.js')
await withRateLimit({ github, core }, async (stats) => {
stats.prs = 1
@@ -16,7 +17,7 @@ module.exports = async ({ github, context, core, dry }) => {
run_id: context.runId,
per_page: 100,
})
).find(({ name }) => name.endsWith('Check / cherry-pick')).html_url +
).find(({ name }) => name.endsWith('Check / commits')).html_url +
'?pr=' +
pull_number
@@ -137,7 +138,11 @@ module.exports = async ({ github, context, core, dry }) => {
}
}
const commits = await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listCommits, {
// For now we short-circuit the list of commits when cherryPicks should not be checked.
// This will not run any checks, but still trigger the "dismiss reviews" part below.
const commits = !cherryPicks
? []
: await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listCommits, {
...context.repo,
pull_number,
})
@@ -185,38 +190,10 @@ module.exports = async ({ github, context, core, dry }) => {
// Only create step summary below in case of warnings or errors.
// Also clean up older reviews, when all checks are good now.
// An empty results array will always trigger this condition, which is helpful
// to clean up reviews created by the prepare step when on the wrong branch.
if (results.every(({ severity }) => severity === 'info')) {
if (!dry) {
await Promise.all(
(
await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listReviews, {
...context.repo,
pull_number,
})
)
.filter((review) => review.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]')
.map(async (review) => {
if (review.state === 'CHANGES_REQUESTED') {
await github.rest.pulls.dismissReview({
...context.repo,
pull_number,
review_id: review.id,
message: 'All cherry-picks are good now, thank you!',
})
}
await github.graphql(
`mutation($node_id:ID!) {
minimizeComment(input: {
classifier: RESOLVED,
subjectId: $node_id
})
{ clientMutationId }
}`,
{ node_id: review.node_id },
)
}),
)
}
await dismissReviews({ github, context, dry })
return
}
@@ -336,45 +313,9 @@ module.exports = async ({ github, context, core, dry }) => {
const body = core.summary.stringify()
core.summary.write()
const pendingReview = (
await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listReviews, {
...context.repo,
pull_number,
})
).find(
(review) =>
review.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]' &&
// If a review is still pending, we can just update this instead
// of posting a new one.
(review.state === 'CHANGES_REQUESTED' ||
// No need to post a new review, if an older one with the exact
// same content had already been dismissed.
review.body === body),
)
if (dry) {
if (pendingReview)
core.info(`pending review found: ${pendingReview.html_url}`)
else core.info('no pending review found')
} else {
// Either of those two requests could fail for very long comments. This can only happen
// with multiple commits all hitting the truncation limit for the diff. If you ever hit
// Posting a review could fail for very long comments. This can only happen with
// multiple commits all hitting the truncation limit for the diff. If you ever hit
// this case, consider just splitting up those commits into multiple PRs.
if (pendingReview) {
await github.rest.pulls.updateReview({
...context.repo,
pull_number,
review_id: pendingReview.id,
body,
})
} else {
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
...context.repo,
pull_number,
event: 'REQUEST_CHANGES',
body,
})
}
}
await postReview({ github, context, core, dry, body })
})
}

171
ci/github-script/prepare.js
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
const { classify } = require('../supportedBranches.js')
const { postReview } = require('./reviews.js')
module.exports = async ({ github, context, core }) => {
module.exports = async ({ github, context, core, dry }) => {
const pull_number = context.payload.pull_request.number
for (const retryInterval of [5, 10, 20, 40, 80]) {
@@ -24,6 +25,160 @@ module.exports = async ({ github, context, core }) => {
const { base, head } = prInfo
const baseClassification = classify(base.ref)
core.setOutput('base', baseClassification)
console.log('base classification:', baseClassification)
const headClassification =
base.repo.full_name === head.repo.full_name
? classify(head.ref)
: // PRs from forks are always considered WIP.
{ type: ['wip'] }
core.setOutput('head', headClassification)
console.log('head classification:', headClassification)
if (baseClassification.type.includes('channel')) {
const { stable, version } = baseClassification
const correctBranch = stable ? `release-${version}` : 'master'
const body = [
'The `nixos-*` and `nixpkgs-*` branches are pushed to by the channel release script and should not be merged into directly.',
'',
`Please target \`${correctBranch}\` instead.`,
].join('\n')
await postReview({ github, context, core, dry, body })
throw new Error('The PR targets a channel branch.')
}
if (headClassification.type.includes('wip')) {
// In the following, we look at the git history to determine the base branch that
// this Pull Request branched off of. This is *supposed* to be the branch that it
// merges into, but humans make mistakes. Once that happens we want to error out as
// early as possible.
// To determine the "real base", we are looking at the merge-base of primary development
// branches and the head of the PR. The merge-base which results in the least number of
// commits between that base and head is the real base. We can query for this via GitHub's
// REST API. There can be multiple candidates for the real base with the same number of
// commits. In this case we pick the "best" candidate by a fixed ordering of branches,
// as defined in ci/supportedBranches.js.
//
// These requests take a while, when comparing against the wrong release - they need
// to look at way more than 10k commits in that case. Thus, we try to minimize the
// number of requests across releases:
// - First, we look at the primary development branches only: master and release-xx.yy.
// The branch with the fewest commits gives us the release this PR belongs to.
// - We then compare this number against the relevant staging branches for this release
// to find the exact branch that this belongs to.
// All potential development branches
const branches = (
await github.paginate(github.rest.repos.listBranches, {
...context.repo,
per_page: 100,
})
).map(({ name }) => classify(name))
// All stable primary development branches from latest to oldest.
const releases = branches
.filter(({ stable, type }) => type.includes('primary') && stable)
.sort((a, b) => b.version.localeCompare(a.version))
async function mergeBase({ branch, order, version }) {
const { data } = await github.rest.repos.compareCommitsWithBasehead({
...context.repo,
basehead: `${branch}...${head.sha}`,
// Pagination for this endpoint is about the commits listed, which we don't care about.
per_page: 1,
// Taking the second page skips the list of files of this changeset.
page: 2,
})
return {
branch,
order,
version,
commits: data.total_commits,
sha: data.merge_base_commit.sha,
}
}
// Multiple branches can be OK at the same time, if the PR was created of a merge-base,
// thus storing as array.
let candidates = [await mergeBase(classify('master'))]
for (const release of releases) {
const nextCandidate = await mergeBase(release)
if (candidates[0].commits === nextCandidate.commits)
candidates.push(nextCandidate)
if (candidates[0].commits > nextCandidate.commits)
candidates = [nextCandidate]
// The number 10000 is principally arbitrary, but the GitHub API returns this value
// when the number of commits exceeds it in reality. The difference between two stable releases
// is certainly more than 10k commits, thus this works for us as well: If we're targeting
// a wrong release, the number *will* be 10000.
if (candidates[0].commits < 10000) break
}
core.info(`This PR is for NixOS ${candidates[0].version}.`)
// Secondary development branches for the selected version only.
const secondary = branches.filter(
({ branch, type, version }) =>
type.includes('secondary') && version === candidates[0].version,
)
// Make sure that we always check the current target as well, even if its a WIP branch.
// If it's not a WIP branch, it was already included in either releases or secondary.
if (classify(base.ref).type.includes('wip')) {
secondary.push(classify(base.ref))
}
for (const branch of secondary) {
const nextCandidate = await mergeBase(branch)
if (candidates[0].commits === nextCandidate.commits)
candidates.push(nextCandidate)
if (candidates[0].commits > nextCandidate.commits)
candidates = [nextCandidate]
}
// If the current branch is among the candidates, this is always better than any other,
// thus sorting at -1.
candidates = candidates
.map((candidate) =>
candidate.branch === base.ref
? { ...candidate, order: -1 }
: candidate,
)
.sort((a, b) => a.order - b.order)
const best = candidates.at(0)
core.info('The base branches for this PR are:')
core.info(`github: ${base.ref}`)
core.info(
`candidates: ${candidates.map(({ branch }) => branch).join(',')}`,
)
core.info(`best candidate: ${best.branch}`)
if (best.branch !== base.ref) {
const current = await mergeBase(classify(base.ref))
const body = [
`The PR's base branch is set to \`${current.branch}\`, but ${current.commits === 10000 ? 'at least 10000' : current.commits - best.commits} commits from the \`${best.branch}\` branch are included. Make sure you know the [right base branch for your changes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#branch-conventions), then:`,
`- If the changes should go to the \`${best.branch}\` branch, [change the base branch](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/changing-the-base-branch-of-a-pull-request).`,
`- If the changes should go to the \`${current.branch}\` branch, rebase your PR onto the correct merge-base:`,
' ```bash',
` # git rebase --onto $(git merge-base upstream/${current.branch} HEAD) $(git merge-base upstream/${best.branch} HEAD)`,
` git rebase --onto ${current.sha} ${best.sha}`,
` git push --force-with-lease`,
' ```',
].join('\n')
await postReview({ github, context, core, dry, body })
throw new Error(`The PR contains commits from a different base.`)
}
}
let mergedSha, targetSha
if (prInfo.mergeable) {
@@ -39,7 +194,7 @@ module.exports = async ({ github, context, core }) => {
} else {
core.warning('The PR has a merge conflict.')
mergedSha = prInfo.head.sha
mergedSha = head.sha
targetSha = (
await github.rest.repos.compareCommitsWithBasehead({
...context.repo,
@@ -56,18 +211,6 @@ module.exports = async ({ github, context, core }) => {
core.setOutput('systems', require('../supportedSystems.json'))
const baseClassification = classify(base.ref)
core.setOutput('base', baseClassification)
console.log('base classification:', baseClassification)
const headClassification =
base.repo.full_name === head.repo.full_name
? classify(head.ref)
: // PRs from forks are always considered WIP.
{ type: ['wip'] }
core.setOutput('head', headClassification)
console.log('head classification:', headClassification)
const files = (
await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listFiles, {
...context.repo,

85
ci/github-script/reviews.js Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
async function dismissReviews({ github, context, dry }) {
const pull_number = context.payload.pull_request.number
if (dry) {
return
}
await Promise.all(
(
await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listReviews, {
...context.repo,
pull_number,
})
)
.filter((review) => review.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]')
.map(async (review) => {
if (review.state === 'CHANGES_REQUESTED') {
await github.rest.pulls.dismissReview({
...context.repo,
pull_number,
review_id: review.id,
message: 'All good now, thank you!',
})
}
await github.graphql(
`mutation($node_id:ID!) {
minimizeComment(input: {
classifier: RESOLVED,
subjectId: $node_id
})
{ clientMutationId }
}`,
{ node_id: review.node_id },
)
}),
)
}
async function postReview({ github, context, core, dry, body }) {
const pull_number = context.payload.pull_request.number
const pendingReview = (
await github.paginate(github.rest.pulls.listReviews, {
...context.repo,
pull_number,
})
).find(
(review) =>
review.user.login === 'github-actions[bot]' &&
// If a review is still pending, we can just update this instead
// of posting a new one.
(review.state === 'CHANGES_REQUESTED' ||
// No need to post a new review, if an older one with the exact
// same content had already been dismissed.
review.body === body),
)
if (dry) {
if (pendingReview)
core.info(`pending review found: ${pendingReview.html_url}`)
else core.info('no pending review found')
core.info(body)
} else {
if (pendingReview) {
await github.rest.pulls.updateReview({
...context.repo,
pull_number,
review_id: pendingReview.id,
body,
})
} else {
await github.rest.pulls.createReview({
...context.repo,
pull_number,
event: 'REQUEST_CHANGES',
body,
})
}
}
}
module.exports = {
dismissReviews,
postReview,
}

17
ci/github-script/run
View File

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ import { program } from 'commander'
import * as core from '@actions/core'
import { getOctokit } from '@actions/github'
async function run(action, owner, repo, pull_number, dry = true) {
async function run(action, owner, repo, pull_number, options = {}) {
const token = execSync('gh auth token', { encoding: 'utf-8' }).trim()
const github = getOctokit(token)
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ async function run(action, owner, repo, pull_number, dry = true) {
},
},
core,
dry,
dry: true,
...options,
})
}
@@ -45,9 +46,10 @@ program
.argument('<owner>', 'Owner of the GitHub repository to check (Example: NixOS)')
.argument('<repo>', 'Name of the GitHub repository to check (Example: nixpkgs)')
.argument('<pr>', 'Number of the Pull Request to check')
.action(async (owner, repo, pr) => {
.option('--no-dry', 'Make actual modifications')
.action(async (owner, repo, pr, options) => {
const prepare = (await import('./prepare.js')).default
run(prepare, owner, repo, pr)
run(prepare, owner, repo, pr, options)
})
program
@@ -56,9 +58,10 @@ program
.argument('<owner>', 'Owner of the GitHub repository to check (Example: NixOS)')
.argument('<repo>', 'Name of the GitHub repository to check (Example: nixpkgs)')
.argument('<pr>', 'Number of the Pull Request to check')
.action(async (owner, repo, pr) => {
.option('--no-cherry-picks', 'Do not expect cherry-picks.')
.action(async (owner, repo, pr, options) => {
const commits = (await import('./commits.js')).default
run(commits, owner, repo, pr)
run(commits, owner, repo, pr, options)
})
program
@@ -74,7 +77,7 @@ program
try {
process.env.GITHUB_WORKSPACE = tmp
process.chdir(tmp)
run(labels, owner, repo, pr, options.dry)
run(labels, owner, repo, pr, options)
} finally {
rmSync(tmp, { recursive: true })
}

3
ci/request-reviews/default.nix
View File

@@ -17,15 +17,12 @@ stdenvNoCC.mkDerivation {
./get-code-owners.sh
./request-reviewers.sh
./request-code-owner-reviews.sh
./verify-base-branch.sh
./dev-branches.txt
];
};
nativeBuildInputs = [ makeWrapper ];
dontBuild = true;
installPhase = ''
mkdir -p $out/bin
mv dev-branches.txt $out/bin
for bin in *.sh; do
mv "$bin" "$out/bin"
wrapProgram "$out/bin/$bin" \

8
ci/request-reviews/dev-branches.txt
View File

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
# Trusted development branches:
# These generally require PRs to update and are built by Hydra.
# Keep this synced with the branches in .github/workflows/eval.yml
master
staging
release-*
staging-*
haskell-updates

24
ci/request-reviews/request-code-owner-reviews.sh
View File

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Requests reviews for a PR after verifying that the base branch is correct
# Requests reviews for a PR
set -euo pipefail
tmp=$(mktemp -d)
@@ -11,14 +11,6 @@ log() {
echo "$@" >&2
}
effect() {
if [[ -n "${DRY_MODE:-}" ]]; then
log "Skipping in dry mode:" "${@@Q}"
else
"$@"
fi
}
if (( $# < 3 )); then
log "Usage: $0 GITHUB_REPO PR_NUMBER OWNERS_FILE"
exit 1
@@ -63,20 +55,6 @@ git -C "$tmp/nixpkgs.git" config remote.fork.promisor true
git -C "$tmp/nixpkgs.git" fetch --no-tags fork "$prBranch"
headRef=$(git -C "$tmp/nixpkgs.git" rev-parse refs/remotes/fork/"$prBranch")
log "Checking correctness of the base branch"
if ! "$SCRIPT_DIR"/verify-base-branch.sh "$tmp/nixpkgs.git" "$headRef" "$baseRepo" "$baseBranch" "$prRepo" "$prBranch" | tee "$tmp/invalid-base-error" >&2; then
log "Posting error as comment"
if ! response=$(effect gh api \
--method POST \
-H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \
-H "X-GitHub-Api-Version: 2022-11-28" \
"/repos/$baseRepo/issues/$prNumber/comments" \
-F "body=@$tmp/invalid-base-error"); then
log "Failed to post the comment: $response"
fi
exit 1
fi
log "Requesting reviews from code owners"
"$SCRIPT_DIR"/get-code-owners.sh "$tmp/nixpkgs.git" "$ownersFile" "$baseBranch" "$headRef" | \
"$SCRIPT_DIR"/request-reviewers.sh "$baseRepo" "$prNumber" "$prAuthor"

104
ci/request-reviews/verify-base-branch.sh
View File

@@ -1,104 +0,0 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Check that a PR doesn't include commits from other development branches.
# Fails with next steps if it does
set -euo pipefail
tmp=$(mktemp -d)
trap 'rm -rf "$tmp"' exit
SCRIPT_DIR=$(dirname "$0")
log() {
echo "$@" >&2
}
# Small helper to check whether an element is in a list
# Usage: `elementIn foo "${list[@]}"`
elementIn() {
local e match=$1
shift
for e; do
if [[ "$e" == "$match" ]]; then
return 0
fi
done
return 1
}
if (( $# < 6 )); then
log "Usage: $0 LOCAL_REPO HEAD_REF BASE_REPO BASE_BRANCH PR_REPO PR_BRANCH"
exit 1
fi
localRepo=$1
headRef=$2
baseRepo=$3
baseBranch=$4
prRepo=$5
prBranch=$6
# All development branches
devBranchPatterns=()
while read -r pattern; do
if [[ "$pattern" != '#'* ]]; then
devBranchPatterns+=("$pattern")
fi
done < "$SCRIPT_DIR/dev-branches.txt"
git -C "$localRepo" branch --list --format "%(refname:short)" "${devBranchPatterns[@]}" > "$tmp/dev-branches"
readarray -t devBranches < "$tmp/dev-branches"
if [[ "$baseRepo" == "$prRepo" ]] && elementIn "$prBranch" "${devBranches[@]}"; then
log "This PR merges $prBranch into $baseBranch, no commit check necessary"
exit 0
fi
# The current merge base of the PR
prMergeBase=$(git -C "$localRepo" merge-base "$baseBranch" "$headRef")
log "The PR's merge base with the base branch $baseBranch is $prMergeBase"
# This is purely for debugging
git -C "$localRepo" rev-list --reverse "$baseBranch".."$headRef" > "$tmp/pr-commits"
log "The PR includes these $(wc -l < "$tmp/pr-commits") commits:"
cat <"$tmp/pr-commits" >&2
for testBranch in "${devBranches[@]}"; do
if [[ -z "$(git -C "$localRepo" rev-list -1 --since="1 month ago" "$testBranch")" ]]; then
log "Not checking $testBranch, was inactive for the last month"
continue
fi
log "Checking if commits from $testBranch are included in the PR"
# We need to check for any commits that are in the PR which are also in the test branch.
# We could check each commit from the PR individually, but that's unnecessarily slow.
#
# This does _almost_ what we want: `git rev-list --count headRef testBranch ^baseBranch`,
# except that it includes commits that are reachable from _either_ headRef or testBranch,
# instead of restricting it to ones reachable by both
# Easily fixable though, because we can use `git merge-base testBranch headRef`
# to get the least common ancestor (aka merge base) commit reachable by both.
# If the branch being tested is indeed the right base branch,
# this is then also the commit from that branch that the PR is based on top of.
testMergeBase=$(git -C "$localRepo" merge-base "$testBranch" "$headRef")
# And then use the `git rev-list --count`, but replacing the non-working
# `headRef testBranch` with the merge base of the two.
extraCommits=$(git -C "$localRepo" rev-list --count "$testMergeBase" ^"$baseBranch")
if (( extraCommits != 0 )); then
log -e "\e[33m"
echo "The PR's base branch is set to $baseBranch, but $extraCommits commits from the $testBranch branch are included. Make sure you know the [right base branch for your changes](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#branch-conventions), then:"
echo "- If the changes should go to the $testBranch branch, [change the base branch](https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/proposing-changes-to-your-work-with-pull-requests/changing-the-base-branch-of-a-pull-request) to $testBranch"
echo "- If the changes should go to the $baseBranch branch, rebase your PR onto the merge base with the $baseBranch branch:"
echo " \`\`\`bash"
echo " # git rebase --onto \$(git merge-base upstream/$baseBranch HEAD) \$(git merge-base upstream/$testBranch HEAD)"
echo " git rebase --onto $prMergeBase $testMergeBase"
echo " git push --force-with-lease"
echo " \`\`\`"
log -e "\e[m"
exit 1
fi
done
log "Base branch is correct, no commits from development branches are included"

15
ci/supportedBranches.js
View File

@@ -13,6 +13,16 @@ const typeConfig = {
nixpkgs: ['channel'],
}
// "order" ranks the development branches by how likely they are the intended base branch
// when they are an otherwise equally good fit according to ci/github-script/prepare.js.
const orderConfig = {
master: 0,
release: 1,
staging: 2,
'haskell-updates': 3,
'staging-next': 4,
}
function split(branch) {
return {
...branch.match(
@@ -24,8 +34,11 @@ function split(branch) {
function classify(branch) {
const { prefix, version } = split(branch)
return {
branch,
order: orderConfig[prefix] ?? Infinity,
stable: (version ?? 'unstable') !== 'unstable',
type: typeConfig[prefix] ?? ['wip'],
version: version ?? 'unstable',
}
}
@@ -39,6 +52,7 @@ if (!module.parent) {
}
testSplit('master')
testSplit('release-25.05')
testSplit('staging')
testSplit('staging-next')
testSplit('staging-25.05')
testSplit('staging-next-25.05')
@@ -55,6 +69,7 @@ if (!module.parent) {
}
testClassify('master')
testClassify('release-25.05')
testClassify('staging')
testClassify('staging-next')
testClassify('staging-25.05')
testClassify('staging-next-25.05')