CONTRIBUTING: discourage style reviews not based on written rules

This commit is contained in:
Linus Heckemann
2025-08-18 13:32:31 +02:00
parent 554be64955
commit 1543459f99

View File

@@ -661,6 +661,12 @@ If you have any problems with formatting, please ping the [formatting team](http
As an exception, an explicit conditional expression with null can be used when fixing a important bug without triggering a mass rebuild. As an exception, an explicit conditional expression with null can be used when fixing a important bug without triggering a mass rebuild.
If this is done a follow up pull request _should_ be created to change the code to `lib.optional(s)`. If this is done a follow up pull request _should_ be created to change the code to `lib.optional(s)`.
- Any style choices not covered here but that can be expressed as general rules should be left at the discretion of the authors of changes and _not_ commented in reviews.
The purpose of this is:
- to avoid churn as contributors with different style preferences undo each other's changes,
- to ensure that style rules are written down and consistent (and can thus be followed when authoring changes, reducing review cycles),
- and to encourage reviews to focus on more impactful considerations.
# Practical contributing advice # Practical contributing advice
To contribute effectively and efficiently, you need to be aware of how the process generally works. To contribute effectively and efficiently, you need to be aware of how the process generally works.