CONTRIBUTING: discourage style reviews not based on written rules
This commit is contained in:
@@ -661,6 +661,12 @@ If you have any problems with formatting, please ping the [formatting team](http
|
|||||||
As an exception, an explicit conditional expression with null can be used when fixing a important bug without triggering a mass rebuild.
|
As an exception, an explicit conditional expression with null can be used when fixing a important bug without triggering a mass rebuild.
|
||||||
If this is done a follow up pull request _should_ be created to change the code to `lib.optional(s)`.
|
If this is done a follow up pull request _should_ be created to change the code to `lib.optional(s)`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- Any style choices not covered here but that can be expressed as general rules should be left at the discretion of the authors of changes and _not_ commented in reviews.
|
||||||
|
The purpose of this is:
|
||||||
|
- to avoid churn as contributors with different style preferences undo each other's changes,
|
||||||
|
- to ensure that style rules are written down and consistent (and can thus be followed when authoring changes, reducing review cycles),
|
||||||
|
- and to encourage reviews to focus on more impactful considerations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Practical contributing advice
|
# Practical contributing advice
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To contribute effectively and efficiently, you need to be aware of how the process generally works.
|
To contribute effectively and efficiently, you need to be aware of how the process generally works.
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user